![]() If you intend to keep the music, you should pay for it. Taking music that the owner would like you to pay forwhether by copying it from an iPod, duplicating someone''s audio CD, or downloading the music from an illegal source on the Internetis wrong. Feel free to agree or disagree, as the mood strikes you. Which brings us, of course, to this question: Music Sharing: Right or Wrong? Excuse the rampant editorializing, but here are the issues surrounding music sharing as I see them. Beyond that, it''s up to the individual user to decide whether it''s morally responsible to enjoy the work of others without paying for it. Apple was content to make sharing files difficult enough to discourage casual pirates and to include the words " Don''t steal music" in iPod packaging and advertisements. Parties that have a greater stake in the game (the recording industry, for example) can spend their time and money on copy-protection schemes and Washington lobbyists. Apple decided that it didn''t care to jump aboard this merry-go-round. And because copy-protection schemes will be defeated, companies that embrace copy protection risk creating an expensive and time-consuming cycle of devising protection schemes, waiting for them to be broken, devising new protection schemes, waiting for them to be broken, and on, and on, and on. Those who are bent on piracy will always find a way to defeat any copy-protection scheme they encounter. Countless bright individuals take it as a personal challenge to outwit any copy-protection scheme that comes along. Jobs'' words, I believe he''s saying that no matter how secure the knot you tie is, someone will come along and untie it. It''s a behavior issue." If I may be so bold as to interpret Mr. If this is the case, why didn''t Apple come up with some impossible-to-crack encryption system, rather than this invisibility scheme? I''ll let Apple''s CEO, Steve Jobs, answer that one: "Piracy is not a technological issue. Leaving these files out in the open could tempt people who would not otherwise pirate music, and it might leave Apple open to criticism (and lawsuits) from the stodgier elements of the entertainment industry. And why would Apple want to discourage such a procedure? Because Apple doesn''t want the iPod to facilitate the practice of sharing music illegally. Why would Apple do such a thing? Simple: to make it harder to copy files from your iPod to a Macintosh or PC. Those music files sit right alongside the Contacts, Calendars, and Notes folders you just can''t see them. ![]() Apple has done no more than create a scheme whereby the iPod''s music files are placed in an invisible folder. Has Apple created a stealth partition that stores only song data? Do the songs sit in some kind of temporary storage buffer and disappear when the battery drains? Is the iPod really some remarkable wireless receiving device that plays songs beamed from Apple''s super-secret orbiting satellite? No, no, and no. ![]() ![]() You know that the iPod contains your entire library of Bill Frisell CDs, yet they''re nowhere in sight. توضیحات افزودن یادداشت جدید The Hidden Revealed: Song Storage on the iPod If you mount your iPod as an external storage device and double-click its icon, you''ll be surprised to find that it contains just a few folders: Contacts, Calendars, and (if you have a third- or fourth-generation iPod, iPod Photo, or iPod mini) Notes. Index Secrets of the iPod and iTunes Fifth EditionByĬhristopher Breen Publisher: Peachpit PressPub Date: December 20, 2004ISBN: 9-4Pages: 488.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |